Re: Alternatives to Capitalism
I have very little trust in theoretical political systems created by armchair intellectuals with no actual experience in real government.
They fabricate highly unnatural (which, as used here, means "do not correspond with human nature"), fanciful, idealistic, and baroque systems that only work in the lala land of words on paper.
The basic systems (and don't get lost in terminology here) are A) rule by one with power, B) limited rule by one with multiple powers, C) leadership by one with multiple powerful rulers, D) shared leadership with multiple powerful rulers.
These exist, and every theoretic system will revert to one of these, because they are natural (which, as used here, means "correspond with human nature"), having evolved along with human societies.
I have very little trust in theoretical political systems created by armchair intellectuals with no actual experience in real government.
They fabricate highly unnatural (which, as used here, means "do not correspond with human nature"), fanciful, idealistic, and baroque systems that only work in the lala land of words on paper.
The basic systems (and don't get lost in terminology here) are A) rule by one with power, B) limited rule by one with multiple powers, C) leadership by one with multiple powerful rulers, D) shared leadership with multiple powerful rulers.
These exist, and every theoretic system will revert to one of these, because they are natural (which, as used here, means "correspond with human nature"), having evolved along with human societies.
Comment