Collusion in the sense of proving that the losing side was colluding with the media? Because that,
unlike the DNC's domestic collusion, has not been proven.
I seem to recall being told that I was dangerous and undemocratic for even
questioning the potential validity of the election not too many months ago.
Also, I
highly disagree with the notion that getting rid of Trump would change nothing. Paul Ryan, and even Pence as far as I am concerned, are both Reaganites. No different in any meaningful way than any president we've had since Carter, and most politicians in general for that matter. Neocons and neoliberals are
both corporate centrists. Though, both Ryan and Pence would (and I believe, did) deny being one.
Trump is the change, but people are scared of change.
The idea that there is
any meaningful difference between mainstream Republicans and Democrats is
laughable. Even a lot of the fringe is more
corporate than anything else. One puppet of Wall Street is as good as the next, especially when you are talking about presidents. The last good one we had was Eisenhower, and the last one that wasn't just a cookie-cutter clone was Carter.
If Trump is being upfront with us about what he plans to do, and I've seen
very little so far to dissuade me of that notion, then this hypothetical Russian involvement is a godsend. Putin would be a damned
hero, fixing our broken system.
Because, and this is important,
NONE of the emails were altered or fabricated and there was absolutely no foreign vote tampering... or at least, no one is seriously suggesting either. So, if American journalists were
doing their jobs then there would be no need of, or point to, foreign involvement.
The info would already be out there, and as the info itself points out it was
not hard to get. Didn't exactly need the backing of a government agency to crack that case.
Bookmarks