Re: Interesting legal case
I actually agree here, to an extent. If both parents were being morons and just did'nt bother, both should be held financially responsible, because they are morons. Moron is not definable in a legal capacity though, so keeping the law to mean that both parents are financially responsible for the child carried to term is fine, If you wanna have sex, know who you are doing it with, and keep in mind, the only way for absolutely nothing to go wrong, is not boinking. It is what it is. Keep in mind birth control pills and IUDs are not free. and both require prescriptions.
The actual article on the other hand creates merry mayhem with abortion rights attempts. (I am going to quote wikipedia, please forgive me)
Which is good and important. But it makes things hairy. It gives opponents room to skirt things, like if a man wants her to keep the baby, and she doesn't, can he have her declared insane in the eyes of certain courts and forced to carry the baby to term or get murder charges? So while I want to say murder, cause I want this bugger to never see the light of day again, I have to say I would prefer attempted murder of the adult victim, (bugger manslaughter, there are major reasons pills require prescriptions and doctor patient understanding, what if she ends up infertile or any one of another major issues including death, this kid is not a doctor.) Also, is his father being charged with anything? because that's how he got these meds, his father eigther was complacent, or involved. But stack what charges you can on this guy.
Originally posted by Monster
View Post
The actual article on the other hand creates merry mayhem with abortion rights attempts. (I am going to quote wikipedia, please forgive me)
bill would not "be construed to permit the prosecution" "of any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or a person authorized by law to act on her behalf", "of any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child" or "of any woman with respect to her unborn child."
Comment