Re: The NSA has a picture of you
I wonder if the NSA could be persuaded to protect us from hackers:
With more and more activity confined to the internet, access to personal correspondence and browsing habits allows hackers intimate knowledge of their targets. Although the hacker’s action may be limited to just one of sabotage, misrepresentation, voyeurism, intimidation or larceny, the victim’s anticipation of the potential threat – conceivably all listed offences in combination – reinforces the violence of the act.
It can be assumed from the higher risk of detection and the higher risk of serious recriminations that burglars are motivated by a greater degree of necessity than hackers and so have less opportunity for moral choice, yet whereas in many places burglars can be lawfully subjected to lethal summary justice, hacking is often considered a petty offence or even a laudable one where the effect is comic or flattering to popular prejudice.
I wonder if the NSA could be persuaded to protect us from hackers:
With more and more activity confined to the internet, access to personal correspondence and browsing habits allows hackers intimate knowledge of their targets. Although the hacker’s action may be limited to just one of sabotage, misrepresentation, voyeurism, intimidation or larceny, the victim’s anticipation of the potential threat – conceivably all listed offences in combination – reinforces the violence of the act.
It can be assumed from the higher risk of detection and the higher risk of serious recriminations that burglars are motivated by a greater degree of necessity than hackers and so have less opportunity for moral choice, yet whereas in many places burglars can be lawfully subjected to lethal summary justice, hacking is often considered a petty offence or even a laudable one where the effect is comic or flattering to popular prejudice.
Comment