So.......
I have a favorite website to refer people to as a booklist. Also, they have some good articles and such.
But...
The domain is expired or suspended or whatever. Went to wayback machine...I can access of their stuff still. Which is cool...but...I don't know if I trust that totally, ya know?
Now, I would never plagiarize someone's stuff, and I believe in proper attribution...but this makes me think, at what point is it legal and/or ethical to "rescue" someone else's work from the internet and "republish" it (assuming proper attribution)?
For example--their "terms of use" say that if you wanted to use the article in its entirety on a web site you should contact them for permission (by the way, I tried this once and never got a response with them, because I think by that time they weren't a group anymore). BUT, their copyright for the page says 1997-2006...so, is it fair game now?
I remember a bit about fair use laws and all of that from my technical writing class in college, but I also remember that copyright law is sort of confusing.
(by the way, while I'd love an answer to my particular dilemma, I brought this up for general discussion on the idea. I think I posted an article a while back in the science section that the ephemeral nature of virtual information is a problem with raw data among scientists, now that data is electronic and not hard copy...technology means that a lot of information from the 80's and 90's is on floppy drives, etc)
I have a favorite website to refer people to as a booklist. Also, they have some good articles and such.
But...
The domain is expired or suspended or whatever. Went to wayback machine...I can access of their stuff still. Which is cool...but...I don't know if I trust that totally, ya know?
Now, I would never plagiarize someone's stuff, and I believe in proper attribution...but this makes me think, at what point is it legal and/or ethical to "rescue" someone else's work from the internet and "republish" it (assuming proper attribution)?
For example--their "terms of use" say that if you wanted to use the article in its entirety on a web site you should contact them for permission (by the way, I tried this once and never got a response with them, because I think by that time they weren't a group anymore). BUT, their copyright for the page says 1997-2006...so, is it fair game now?
I remember a bit about fair use laws and all of that from my technical writing class in college, but I also remember that copyright law is sort of confusing.
(by the way, while I'd love an answer to my particular dilemma, I brought this up for general discussion on the idea. I think I posted an article a while back in the science section that the ephemeral nature of virtual information is a problem with raw data among scientists, now that data is electronic and not hard copy...technology means that a lot of information from the 80's and 90's is on floppy drives, etc)
Comment